3 ms·
>Another is that it's harder to charge a phone if you have headphones plugged into its sole port. >The new specification, due this quarter, adds features to en
by wang_li 10y ago
>Another is that it's harder to charge a phone if you have headphones plugged into its sole port.
>The new specification, due this quarter, adds features to ensure a USB headphone doesn't drain too much battery power...
The second isn't an answer to the problem of the first.
>As a result, with USB headphones, "the difference in battery life is negligible" compared with 3.5mm audio jacks.
It's not negligible because, so far it seems like we are going to have a choice of a charging cable or an audio cable. Currently I can listen to audio and charge my phone simultaneously, so in an hour my net battery life is +25%. The best the either/or situation can deliver is -0.0% (but likely something more along the lines of -5% in an hour of audio listening.)
- eyeJam 10y agoLook, I know this article is a bit diluted, but haven't you always wanted to hear your favourite music filtered through an obnoxious reverb filter? Imagine, you can now have the experience of hearing Bob Marley perform in an opera theatre! In all honesty this has to be one of my favorite quotes from the article: "But there are good arguments to be made for embracing USB audio, Saunders said, and the companies that make USB controller chips are very excited about the idea." Wow, the people manufacturing this thing are excited about it? No way