3 ms·
> HN is living proof. of what? that you don't need a separate mobile site (or js) to show a most basic wall of text? open up amazon.com or walmart.com and see
by leeoniya 10y ago
> HN is living proof.
of what? that you don't need a separate mobile site (or js) to show a most basic wall of text?
open up amazon.com or walmart.com and see how your justification holds up. certainly, there are simple layouts with sparse content that can be made responsive easily (blogs, image portfolios, etc) but this is a far cry from proof that a broad statement is at all applicable.
- qwertyuiop924 10y agoFair enough. But how many sites on the internet that have special mobile sites are, at the end of the day, just showing walls of text?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- coldtea 10y ago>of what? that you don't need a separate mobile site (or js) to show a most basic wall of text? Most sites only need to show just that. And fail miserably at it. >open up amazon.com or walmart.com and see how your justification holds up. 90% of sites are content based, not Amazon or Walmart. And even then could do with a much simpler layout.
- paulddraper 10y agoThose are a pretty important 10%.