4 ms·
Paying $0.21 to serve 30k pageviews over an hour is expensive. Paying $0.21 to serve 30k pageviews over a month is dirt cheap. He did the latter, stop compari
by zepolen 10y ago
Paying $0.21 to serve 30k pageviews over an hour is expensive.
Paying $0.21 to serve 30k pageviews over a month is dirt cheap.
He did the latter, stop comparing to the former. The smallest VPS you can get is 10$/month.
- vidarh 10y agoThe smallest VPS I found by checking a single provider clocked in at GBP 2.99, or $3.89. Otherwise, point taken, but I'd imagine the scenarios where cutting cost by ~$10 or ~$4 per month matters are relatively few.
- ViViDboarder 10y agoI know Scaleway is €2.99. Curious to know who is £2.99?
- wahnfrieden 10y agohttps://billing.prgmr.com/index.php/order/main/packages/xen/?group_id=10 https://billing.prgmr.com/index.php/order/main/packages/xen/...
- unethical_ban 10y agoSmallest VPS at DigitalOcean and Vultr is $5/mo.
- brassic 10y agoI pay $15/year for a VPS at ramnode.
- retroafroman 10y agoThey're cheaper than that, if you're willing to deal with shady(ish) companies: lowendbox.com
- nogox 10y agoThat's the point. Serverless is only cost effective in low traffic cases. If you get a stable or high volume of request, a traditional server is way cheaper.