4 ms·
Ran into a funny situation with this the other week where IE 10 supports flexbox (sort of), but doesn't support @supports. So that can happen. But if you're O
by dccoolgai 10y ago
Ran into a funny situation with this the other week where IE 10 supports flexbox (sort of), but doesn't support @supports. So that can happen. But if you're OK sequestering "doesn't support @supports" browsers into the non-enhanced experience, it works great.
- Flimm 10y agoIE10 and IE11 have a large numbers of bugs in their flexbox implementation or only support the 2012 syntax, so this might actually be desirable. (Compatibility info from http://caniuse.com/#feat=flexbox http://caniuse.com/#feat=flexbox )
- dccoolgai 10y agoYeah, that's why I said "(sort of)". But in my case, the flexbox features I was using worked OK. I was actually fine with having IE10 see the "block layout" fallback (b/c if you use IE10 the web looks broken for you anyway, so you should be overjoyed that you get a layout that works even if it's not that fancy), but my marketing manager felt differently. Life.