4 ms·
As you say yourself, there is no formal investigation. So there is no point to the "learning" you are suggesting. Indeed, we have had recent reforms. And if you
by hwh 10y ago
As you say yourself, there is no formal investigation. So there is no point to the "learning" you are suggesting. Indeed, we have had recent reforms. And if you oppose them, please do not hide it behind snide remarks. Those reforms, in essence, were as follows: Before the reforms, punishable sexual misconduct was given only in the case the victim opposed it actively. Actively meaning not words, but actual corporal, physical defense actions. What is new after the reforms, is that the victim now has to utter a recognizable will to not suffer the actions.
As we are talking about penal laws, it is still needed to establish proof of this recognizable will.
About reputation: penal laws do not have to do with that. Again, as you state, this can be seen in this case where there is no formal investigation.
- sdoering 10y agoSorry, but as far as I can tell you are not fully correct. A clearly stated "No" did already suffice before these "reforms". Also, I read a lot of articles by people way more versed in these topics then me who did really not agree with the way the new version of the law turned out. Even former judges who are afraid of the things to come under these new laws. Maybe I am wrong, but I do strongly believe in innocent until proven otherwise. At least for me this law feels more like another step in the direction of guilty until proven innocent. [Edit formatting]