The author seems to conflate general math (arithmetic, variables, functions, basic modelling) with specialized math, used for advanced research topics like topo

The author seems to conflate general math (arithmetic, variables, functions, basic modelling) with specialized math, used for advanced research topics like topology, number theory, etc. Apart from this conflation, the article is very confused, mixes lots of unrelated topics, and is hard to follow. Maybe a rewrite is in order? Or perhaps writing logical arguments, with clear ideas that make sense is also an elitist thing we should avoid?