3 ms·
So if you were 90% sure (not enough to convict) a guy was going to murder someone you'd be happy with him hanging out with your friends? Of course you wouldn't
by moomin 10y ago
So if you were 90% sure (not enough to convict) a guy was going to murder someone you'd be happy with him hanging out with your friends?
Of course you wouldn't, so stop using criminal law as your standard for identifying when someone's a bad hat.
- exstudent2 10y agoI wouldn't create a website named after the person accusing them of things the court didn't find them guilty of. Not hanging out with someone because you don't trust them? Fine. Publicly assassinating someone's reputation with no evidence, chance for rebuttal or formal hearing? Bogus.
- mcguire 10y agoJust so we're clear: you're ok with letting them continue their antics on other people, as long as you aren't involved?
- exstudent2 10y agoI'm not s vigilante if that's what you're asking. It's up to the legal system to punish people, not me.
- moomin 10y agoAgain, it's not about punishment, it's about protection. You don't put wire around a chicken coop to punish foxes. You do it to protect chickens.