> It's such a typical Google move to market something as "better for the web" when what they really mean is "better for our pockets." It might be better for th

> It's such a typical Google move to market something as "better for the web" when what they really mean is "better for our pockets." It might be better for their bottom line (I haven't thought about it much, but it makes sense that it would be, so I'll just go with that), but that doesn't mean it isn't also better for the web and users. Same thing with Facebook Instant Articles. I now find myself, as a user, vastly preferring these sites on mobile, because they are far less likely to hang or hijack my browser.