> A democracy is a land of majority rule. How can you have that without at least a one line constitution that says, more or less, "The majority rules"? You beg

> A democracy is a land of majority rule. How can you have that without at least a one line constitution that says, more or less, "The majority rules"? You beg the question, sir. You very narrow definition of "democracy", majority rule without a constitution, isn't possible. Thus your definition is useless and therefor meaningless.