4 ms·
Meh, this is bullshit. NVIDIA laptop GPUs were always the "same chip". Each "chip" in NVIDIA can be floorswept differently, with parts lasered off and its oper
by hatsunearu 10y ago
Meh, this is bullshit.
NVIDIA laptop GPUs were always the "same chip". Each "chip" in NVIDIA can be floorswept differently, with parts lasered off and its operating clock range adjusted. This is why the 1080 and the 1070 is the "same chip"--GP104.
Previous mobile chips were actually the "same chip" as the desktop ones, except they lasered more off and reduced the clocks even more, sometimes reduced the clocks a lot and lasered less to make the performance better by cramming more hardware.
They just dropped the M thing to show that "oh look, we've come this far!" but in reality, none of their policy actually changed--just floorsweep differently to have less TDP and hopefully it's close enough to desktop tier perf.
edit: what they are, are different SKUs of the "same chip".
edit again: I'm not saying this isn't any small achievement, Pascal has brought a ton of improvements to the design. I'm just saying it's a marketing move that I expect the HN crowd to look through.
- jdietrich 10y agoNope. Unlike previous-generation mobile parts, these are functionally equivalent to the desktop parts - same number of cores, shaders and ROPs, same memory bandwidth. Of course clocks are slightly lower and these parts are binned for higher efficiency, but the performance is very close to the desktop parts. The 980m was substantially cut down compared to the desktop 980 and only had about 55% of the performance.
- happycube 10y agoIt's actually a rather refreshing marketing move - in past gens the "M"s were often smaller chips - while the 980M had the GM204 like the non-ti 980, the GTX960 had the GM107 (GTX750!) Now for BS, go to a store and look for a laptop i7 that's actually a quad core... outside of a gaming laptop.