3 ms·

> 3 - did not destroy evidence. Like with a cloth? Let me correct that for you, Clinton attempted to destroy evidence but was incompetent at it.

• x0x0 10y ago
  She was not under investigation at the time, and none of the emails she deleted ended up being responsive. It's in no way the same as destroying documents or digital storage after the police/fbi talk to you. Even according to Comey, there is no evidence the emails were deleted in an attempt to conceal information [1]. [1] http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/19/politifact-sheet-hillary-clintons-email-controvers/ http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2016/jul/19/...
  • the_trapper 10y ago
    Let's be honest with ourselves here. Director Comey isn't exactly impartial here. His boss (President Obama) has a vested interest in a positive outcome for Hillary, and therefore, so does he. For the record, I'm not saying that he did anything improper regarding this investigation, I'm just saying that he is hardly a neutral third party in this.
    • x0x0 10y ago
      Feel free to revisit Comey's interactions with George Bush re: nsa wiretapping to see if Obama could intimidate him. If he said Obama didn't interfere, we should take him at his word.