2 ms·
That's exactly what my parent comment suggested :-)
by nadaviv 10y ago
That's exactly what my parent comment suggested :-)
- EthanHeilman 10y agoOpps didn't see that. =) Using hashes like you are suggesting you wouldn't even need ZK proofs. There is a simple trick you could do with the keys such that you post a single 128 value which is checkable with a tree of OP_HASH and OP_DUPs and would, with very high probability, reveal all the keys. As pointed out below the problem with this scheme is that you could hash the same files with a little randomness added and make it look like you have more data to sell than you do. I think with some GC-based ZK proofs you could show this isn't true and each file is legitimately different (for example demonstrating randomly selected bit relationships or word frequencies).