4 ms·
Both are great for hobby projects, and offer pretty great bang for buck, but I'd never run consider running anything serious on either, let a lone a business.
by grapehut 10y ago
Both are great for hobby projects, and offer pretty great bang for buck, but I'd never run consider running anything serious on either, let a lone a business.
Some examples:
== Not pay bills (yeah, yeah, I should check my email more often when a credit card expires) ===
* Digital Ocean: All is working, then one day they flip the switch and shut down your servers and delete the backups (that you paid for)
* AWS: Has a super reasonable policy, first by shutting down the servers so you know
* Linode: Not sure
== Get DDoSd ==
* Digital Ocean: 24 hour blackhole, zero support or human contact in this time
* AWS: Servers kept alive, got some engineering assistance
* Linode: 24 (?) hour blackhole, a bit of really bad support
== Physical Server Upgrades ==
* Digital Ocean: Not bad
* AWS: Amazing. Zero downtime, I have 4 year uptime on many servers
* Linode: Botched my servers, more times than I can count. Even had support reboot the WRONG servers of mine when I was talking with them
== Bandwidth ===
* Digital Ocean: shitty and cheap
* AWS: Amazing and stupidly expensive
* Linode: Decent and cheap
I could go on. If it was a hobby project, I'd probably just use Digital Ocean because of their cheap prices and sleek control panel. (Or actually I'd use vultr)
But for anything serious where I have a budget for servers, you'd be crazy to use anything about AWS or Google Cloud
- tedmiston 10y ago> * AWS: Servers kept alive, got some engineering assistance This depends a lot on what level of customer you are.
- tedmiston 10y agoVultr looks very comparable to DigitalOcean. I'm curious why they left DO out of their benchmarks. It seems the most obvious comparison. https://www.vultr.com/benchmarks/ https://www.vultr.com/benchmarks/