3 ms·
what does any of that have to do with any of this case? did any of this incite illegal acts or acts that resulted in violence? no. that part of your post has ze
by swang 10y ago
what does any of that have to do with any of this case? did any of this incite illegal acts or acts that resulted in violence? no. that part of your post has zero relevance to either my post or to the current situation (did someone kill someone? did someone make someone cause someone else to commit an illegal act?)
i said outing peter thiel is not illegal. and in fact the supreme court has ruled that reporting facts is permissible. _but_ it is a really shitty thing to out people.
and the saying is "falsely shout fire in a crowded theater" not just "shout fire in a crowded theater" read up son.
you should also read up because that saying is not "law" and the court case that it originated from was overturned because of its gross ignorance of the first amendment. read up son x2.
- vanattab 10y ago>i said outing peter thiel is not illegal. and in fact the supreme court has ruled that reporting facts is permissible. _but_ it is a really shitty thing to out people. What does this have to do with the case? The case is about a sex tape not outing thiel.
- swang 10y agothe reason he helped hulk hogan was because gawker, "outed" him about 9 years ago. this article is not about the gawker case. it is... i don't know, thiel gloating? trying to deflect any criticism? trying to continue to punish gawker by posting this article the day before final bids for gawker are being accepted?