3 ms·
No, he's literally guarding the place. The correct response to an attack may involve inserting the clip, chamber a round and issue a loud warning before possibl
by johnnyhillbilly 10y ago
No, he's literally guarding the place. The correct response to an attack may involve inserting the clip, chamber a round and issue a loud warning before possibly firing.
An attack on the guard himself is likely to lead to a resolute counterattack.
Soldiers guarding typically have limited police jurisdiction of the area they guard in most countries.
This should be common knowledge.
- napoleond 10y agoBoth you and your parent commenter are sometimes correct, depending on the situation (believe it or not, laws vary from country to country, there are many different types of military groups in each, etc). Your point of view is not always correct, so it should definitely not be common knowledge.
- gknoy 10y agoThe historical nature of soldiers of armed guards with the authority to kill you lends credence to his suggestion that it's not an unreasonable expectation to believe that they _could_ shoot you. Local mileage and laws may vary, but erring on the side of caution when you see a soldier means that it's prudent to act as if he can legally fire upon you -- even if that assumption is not actually true at that specific time or place.