> I always read this as a feature, not a bug, of the constitution. Indeed; it was part of the Great Compromise. But that's not what you argued in your GP comm

> I always read this as a feature, not a bug, of the constitution. Indeed; it was part of the Great Compromise. But that's not what you argued in your GP comment: By implication, you were claiming that this feature of the Constitution supposedly did not support the GGP comment's assertion that rural areas have significant political power (which to me seems well-nigh indisputable).