4 ms·

I'm confused. You think that a comic strip that's been popular since the '60s owes it to a handful of video games made in the mid-'80s?

greenspot 10y ago
Because of the huge reach of Mad they were popular before but they felt more like mediocre filler content within Mad. Yes the style was distinct but the plot was always the same and predictable. With the games they found their real determination: the visual style, the always recurring topic of the spies tricking each one into a trap--the games were the perfect media for Spy vs Spy, way better than the strips. And it was more than a handful of games. Spy vs Spy was a strong merchandise running over many years with an unique and innovative gameplay then for many platforms.
- SideburnsOfDoom 10y ago
  > they felt more like mediocre filler content ... the style was distinct but the plot was always the same and predictable. That describes almost any comic that has been going for over 20 years. That doesn't make it bad, just played out. That it lasted decades at all indicates something good about it.
- PhasmaFelis 10y ago
  There were three games published in 1984-1986 and sporadically ported after that; they were successful at the time, but obscure enough now that they share one slim Wikipedia page. A fourth game was published for PS2/Xbox in 2005 and sank without a ripple.
- lostlogin 10y ago
  Id never heard of the game until your earlier post - Id skip most of mad to read Spy Vs Spy. Predictability isn't necessarily a bad thing - in fact kids seem to particularly love repetition.
mrob 10y ago
I first learned of the characters from the games. For many years I never suspected they might be older than the games.
ptaipale 10y ago
I did read MAD before having the Spy vs. Spy game (which was cool), but I think that many people actually did learn of Spy vs. Spy through the game - though I agree that very likely far from majority.
- dalke 10y ago
  While I knew Spy vs. Spy from the magazine. I had no idea there was a game. I also remember MAD TV had Spy vs. Spy in it.

greenspot 10y ago

Because of the huge reach of Mad they were popular before but they felt more like mediocre filler content within Mad. Yes the style was distinct but the plot was always the same and predictable. With the games they found their real determination: the visual style, the always recurring topic of the spies tricking each one into a trap--the games were the perfect media for Spy vs Spy, way better than the strips. And it was more than a handful of games. Spy vs Spy was a strong merchandise running over many years with an unique and innovative gameplay then for many platforms.

SideburnsOfDoom 10y ago
> they felt more like mediocre filler content ... the style was distinct but the plot was always the same and predictable. That describes almost any comic that has been going for over 20 years. That doesn't make it bad, just played out. That it lasted decades at all indicates something good about it.
PhasmaFelis 10y ago
There were three games published in 1984-1986 and sporadically ported after that; they were successful at the time, but obscure enough now that they share one slim Wikipedia page. A fourth game was published for PS2/Xbox in 2005 and sank without a ripple.
lostlogin 10y ago
Id never heard of the game until your earlier post - Id skip most of mad to read Spy Vs Spy. Predictability isn't necessarily a bad thing - in fact kids seem to particularly love repetition.

mrob 10y ago

I first learned of the characters from the games. For many years I never suspected they might be older than the games.

ptaipale 10y ago

I did read MAD before having the Spy vs. Spy game (which was cool), but I think that many people actually did learn of Spy vs. Spy through the game - though I agree that very likely far from majority.

dalke 10y ago
While I knew Spy vs. Spy from the magazine. I had no idea there was a game. I also remember MAD TV had Spy vs. Spy in it.