3 ms·
With historical data like this you would think that providing it as a download would also be in the best interests of the provider. It would reduce the number o
by kungfooey 17y ago
With historical data like this you would think that providing it as a download would also be in the best interests of the provider. It would reduce the number of total requests against the API. If the download were offered as a torrent, I could see a pretty significant savings in bandwidth costs.
It's also possible that these companies (particular the old-school types who make the decisions) prefer to keep the illusion of a monopoly on these data.
- wizard_2 17y agoI think you hit the nail on the head. It doesn't matter that people can create their own databases, the NYT can still revoke access and stop anyone from accessing their api. It smells of the ideology behind DRM oddly, maintaining the illusion of control.