3 ms·
This is true, but mathematical jargon is more broadly applicable. (Though at this level of detail I would roll stats in with probabilty and hence pretend it is
by adrianratnapala 10y ago
This is true, but mathematical jargon is more broadly applicable. (Though at this level of detail I would roll stats in with probabilty and hence pretend it is part of maths).
I've been a physicist and am now a software engineer. I can use the maths based jargon in both those fields, but not vice versa.
That's partly because everyone in a STEM field had to learn at least some maths. But more importantly: maths is about the logical interconnection of things, while the things themselves are substitutable. So it is no suprise that its jargon can be applied in many fields.
- unexistance 10y agohttps://xkcd.com/435/ https://xkcd.com/435/ Made me remember this. If only the 'upper' fields adopt mathematical naming where applicable :D