> Objecting to that doesn't seem particularly unreasonable; a government ISP has inherent anti-competitive properties Technically anti-competitive, yes. Althou

> Objecting to that doesn't seem particularly unreasonable; a government ISP has inherent anti-competitive properties Technically anti-competitive, yes. Although in the case of Chattanooga, residents now have the option to pay a price more in line with the global first-world market rate. comcast was simply not interested in increasing speed or lowering prices. Now that there is real 'competition' (from the govt run utility), good old comcast has magically lowered their rates and increased service offerings. Because they totally were going to do that anyway /s.