4 ms·
I guess what you really want is what Microsoft is trying to resolve with Checked C in order to bridge the C gap with C++. Here's the link if you are interested
by stephen82 10y ago
I guess what you really want is what Microsoft is trying to resolve with Checked C in order to bridge the C gap with C++.
Here's the link if you are interested: https://github.com/Microsoft/CheckedC https://github.com/Microsoft/CheckedC
- jjnoakes 10y agoI don't think so; Checked C looks to be focusing on array bounds checking and adds new syntax, new pointer types, etc. I want to focus on cleaning up C as it is. I don't want a new syntax or new semantics outside of defining some/most of what is undefined today.
- stephen82 10y agoI would be more than interested to see a demo code using pseudo-language to explain exactly the concept you have in mind. That would be more than interesting for lots of us and you never know; we might get something out of it and why not implement it as a FOSS project?
- jjnoakes 10y agoThe friendly C and boring C proposals are quite close to what I'm thinking of. I was sad to see friendly C abandoned. I hope to find the time shortly to take a stab at something along those lines.