3 ms·
Fair enough. But I would, and indeed, do, argue that potentially safer is better than not potentially safer.
by qwertyuiop924 10y ago
Fair enough. But I would, and indeed, do, argue that potentially safer is better than not potentially safer.
- nickpsecurity 10y agoIn this order: provably safer is better than potentially safer; potentially safer is better than no potential. And still, as I showed, open or closed source at consumer level has little to do with the potential. It's amount of trusted development and/or review of source then distribution of that. Illustrated where greater than means more trustworthy, reliable, and/or effective: 1. Rigorously designed & reviewed open-source is greater than... 2. Rigorously designed & reviewed closed-source is greater than... 3. Typical, open-source is greater than... 4. Typical, closed-source is greater than... 5. Cloud infrastructure based on Concurrent DOS written in a MOL-360 language.
- qwertyuiop924 10y agoI... Completely agree. I honestly have no idea why we're arguing at this point.
- nickpsecurity 10y agoJust took some discussion to clarify our views that's all. Glad we reached an agreement. :)