4 ms·
I think it's fast, fast enough to not have to worry about. OTOH, Angular with it's 2-way bindings gave me ton of performance problems in the past, so if anythin
by jaequery 10y ago
I think it's fast, fast enough to not have to worry about. OTOH, Angular with it's 2-way bindings gave me ton of performance problems in the past, so if anything, I would say that 1-way binding frameworks (riot/react) will be much more performant on a real world project.
- mixedCase 10y agoThe way Angular 1 and Vue.js 1 implement 2-way binding is very different (dirty checking vs getters-setters), which is why Vue.js 1 implementation doesn't have performance issues.
- rk06 10y agoSpeed is a problem in any reasonably complex app. While i might say that riot's speed won't be an issue in 80℅ cases, what about the 20% cases? And its not like difference in speed is small. As the benchmark(i linked in first post) shows, riot is very slow compared to the competition. On the other hand, vue (especially vue 2) is among the fastest.