12 ms·
I wonder if these kinds of teams are lead by extroverts, who appreciate having a captive audience for their peopley, extroverted shenaniagns. Having a stable o
by s_kilk 10y ago
I wonder if these kinds of teams are lead by extroverts, who appreciate having a captive audience for their peopley, extroverted shenaniagns.
Having a stable of people who are contractually obligated to put up with their outgoing personalities.
- crmd 10y agoIt's not nice to belittle individuals whose brains work differently than your own.
- brokenmachine 10y agoThat's true, but the problem is that those outgoing types interfere with the introverts brains from working when they interrupt them constantly. I would like more segregation! Enjoy your riotous atmosphere over there (far away) please!
- ewjordan 10y agoI've mostly seen it pushed (as a hard 100% policy, at least) by well meaning but naive people that have done it a few times before, got obsessed with it, and decided it's this week's cure for everything. The reality is, it will make the team produce fewer bugs. It will also help in knowledge sharing, and in some cases result in tidier designs. But you'll basically have half the manpower. So unless you actually have serious problems with bugs, knowledge sharing, or code design, it's not going to be worth it. There are other ways to achieve quality, and most senior people can do that very well without someone pairing with them.