7 ms·

I think your analogy is flawed on several levels. It's not an analogy, it's a comparison between technologies. The underlying principle of unrestricted communi

by Claudus 10y ago

I think your analogy is flawed on several levels. It's not an analogy, it's a comparison between technologies. The underlying principle of unrestricted communication is what is important. If I were to use an analogy, I'd say telling people to use obsolete methods to communicate is like telling a radio station to broadcast in analog to a world with only digital receivers. removing stuff that's not supposed to be endorsed This comment, among others you made, is exactly the kind of ideology I find disturbing.

legulere 10y ago
> it's a comparison between technologies. Totally different technologies. Facebook can be used and was used in this case as a platform to publish things. Telephones can't, they're a one to one communication medium. If you want to compare facebook with the telephone, you have to compare the part that is providing the same, namely the messenger function of facebook, which is unrestricted in what you can write. > This comment, among others you made, is exactly the kind of ideology I find disturbing. It's not even about hindering people to publish their horrible things, it's about not supporting them.