With the information given, I can't see how you reach that conclusion? Being invited for rice and beans is quite common in some cultures, just as being invited

With the information given, I can't see how you reach that conclusion? Being invited for rice and beans is quite common in some cultures, just as being invited for coffee and cake is in others. It is obviously an example the judge thought would make it clear for the person upon whom the restrictions were placed: "This is no longer for either of you to decide - be careful so you don't get set up." About the names: It could be nicknames, it could be names common in a militant (i.e. political) subculture. There is no information what was meant - only the conclusion that it was racist. About the physical standards of the building, and the assembly line of verdicts: That is something to fix! (Also this clumsy confusion of 'pen' for 'pentitentiary' and 'pen' for 'farm animal enclosure' should be corrected with a new sign.)