> I have not verified the accuracy of this analysis It's not so much that it's inaccurate as that it's not really anything but an op-ed with some basic data.

> I have not verified the accuracy of this analysis It's not so much that it's inaccurate as that it's not really anything but an op-ed with some basic data. The general form of it is thus: "here is some data. I'm saying it means X, which could be explained in Y way or tampering but I won't say it can be explained other ways. Here's a very handwaving explanation of why Y doesn't fit, so I therefore conclude that it must be tampering... I will now devote lots of pages to conspiracy theories about who and why this tampering was done - assuming that I am correct and there is no other explanation." It's a reddit post writ-large, basically.