2 ms·
> Any other comparable language (basically with static types) would want to use would require an IDE too. Go is both statically-typed and perfectly usable with
by wtbob 10y ago
> Any other comparable language (basically with static types) would want to use would require an IDE too.
Go is both statically-typed and perfectly usable without an IDE.
> Or at least configuring Emacs for the task, which can be a full job in itself too.
Modern emacs is pretty easy to set up. Take a look at prelude or spacemacs. You're up & running within a few minutes.
- coldtea 10y ago>Go is both statically-typed and perfectly usable without an IDE. To the same extend that Java is perfectly usable without one. Besides I find Go intolerable with or without an IDE. Not sure how people do any work without Generics, probably don't care about being DRY or don't smell the badness in e.g. using different math methods per type. >Modern emacs is pretty easy to set up. Take a look at prelude or spacemacs. You're up & running within a few minutes. Up and running with ...something. Customizing that, and getting to use it is another story altogether.