2 ms·

Been running it for over 15 years. No SPF. No dkim. Never had complaints, though threads like these have me worried.

• rhizome 10y ago
  You and me both. I think the risks are overplayed, but at the same time it's probably about time to join the future with SPF/DKIM/DMARC.
  • zbuf 10y ago
    And IPv6 is that future. My resource is that when you start connecting on IPv6 many mail providers will consider SPF and proper reverse DNS mandatory.
  • mverwijs 10y ago
    For that, I've been looking into freeposte.io, so I can hop onto the container-train at the same time.
• soneil 10y ago
  I think 15 years of "good behaviour" is exactly what they're missing. gmails 12 years old. If you've had a well-behaved service for as long as they've been keeping track, that probably weighs in your favour much better than anything else. That said, SPF is worth looking into - but it's more a "good neighbour" thing. Rather than having any direct benefit for you, it helps other hosts spot mails that claim to be from you. "Be the change you want to see" type deal.
• walrus01 10y ago
  There is no excuse for not having SPF and DKIM signing set up in 2016/2017. Bet you don't do opportunist TLS 1.2 either?