3 ms·
>The D.E.A. and the F.D.A. insist that there is not enough scientific evidence to justify removing marijuana from Schedule 1. This is a disingenuous argument; t
by will_brown 10y ago
>The D.E.A. and the F.D.A. insist that there is not enough scientific evidence to justify removing marijuana from Schedule 1. This is a disingenuous argument; the government itself has made it impossible to do the kinds of trials and studies that could produce the evidence that would justify changing the drug’s classification.
This can not be overstated. I recently discussed a prior client of mine on HN who is one of the few patients who receive the federally authorized marijuana from University of Mississippi (at a dosage of 360 joints/month). My client has a rare bone disease and has been in the federal program for over 30 years, one of my clients biggest complaints is that while he wanted studies to be conducted regarding the use/effects of marijuana the Government has refused.
- xrstf 10y agoIs your client possibly the same person who was interviewed for Penn & Teller's "Bullshit" on the "War on Drugs" episode[1]? [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQS910WVlKc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQS910WVlKc
- will_brown 10y agoThat's him. I don't generally mention him by name, but as you can tell he is an outspoken and public figure as it relates to both his disease and unique treatment. For example, I represented him in a corporate capacity totally unrelated to that aspect of his life, yet he took every opportunity to inform and educate me about his story.