4 ms·
Take a second look. He's not talking about the watermark, but the logo on the coat.
by techiferous 17y ago
Take a second look. He's not talking about the watermark, but the logo on the coat.
- sp332 17y agoUm, no. No matter what position Keith takes, the logo is always perfectly horizontal. And in the last image, the logo is more than twice as large as in the other photos. Definitely obviously 'shopped.
- techiferous 17y agoYes, of course. But that's not a watermark. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watermark http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watermark
- sp332 17y agohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_watermarking http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_watermarking
- techiferous 17y agoYes, I know what a watermark is. There is a watermark on the photos and you have to look closely to see it. The logo on the coat is not a watermark, since watermarks are not opaque.