I read the article. It is pretty clear in its purpose and reasoning and its points are cogent. Your response is one of characterization, purely. You raise no

I read the article. It is pretty clear in its purpose and reasoning and its points are cogent. Your response is one of characterization, purely. You raise no objections, you provide no argument or reason to believe "they" inhabit an "alternative reality". You do call them names, though "techno-libertarian" is a weird one because how is that different from any other libertarian? I know of no group of people who call themselves "techno-libertarians" so this would seem to imply you are using it as a pejorative or as a code phrase to signal others of a similar ideology to you. At any rate, your response, like so much commentary these days, contains no addressing of the argument, no specific claims or points, but merely derision and attitude.