4 ms·
I look forward to reading the response where the Ethereum (non Classic) community writes their Constitution where they declare how to govern future forking. Ha
by cjslep 10y ago
I look forward to reading the response where the Ethereum (non Classic) community writes their Constitution where they declare how to govern future forking.
Ha ha only serious.
Edit: Seems people don't know HHOS: http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/H/ha-ha-only-serious.html http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/H/ha-ha-only-serious.html
- alanpost 10y agoThey'll make a modest proposal that they can replace the Kansas City Federal Bank. Missouri has too many federal reserve banks anyway.
- jabgrabdthrow 10y agoThe answer is that any time there's a proposed fork the one that changes less rules is called "Classic" and the other picks the new name. If there's a truly ambiguous split, one side tactically cedes the name, like "Classic" did with "Ethereum". Ideally the system would have splits as a first class feature and we could have some kind of versioning system where the more splits a system had the longer its "name" or effective address