3 ms·
I even turned off request policy and noscript in attempt to see the object on that page. I was disappointed. You can find it by clicking through to the Reuters
by nonbel 10y ago
I even turned off request policy and noscript in attempt to see the object on that page. I was disappointed.
You can find it by clicking through to the Reuters link, or here it is directly:
http://s4.reutersmedia.net/resources/r/?m=02&d=20160810&t=2&i=1149080662&w=&fh=&fw=&ll=780&pl=468&sq=&r=LYNXNPEC790LY http://s4.reutersmedia.net/resources/r/?m=02&d=20160810&t=2&...
- IlPeach 10y agoOh gosh thanks!
- Rumudiez 10y agoThanks for the quick fix! How about a vote to change the original link to the entire Reuters article, which this is based on, instead? http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-bulgaria-archaeology-gold-idUKKCN10L0ZE http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-bulgaria-archaeology-gold-i...
- madaxe_again 10y agoI was disappointed I was riveted. Something doesn't need to be big or intricate to be hugely important.
- DanBC 10y agononbel expected to see an image of the object on the page of the submitted article. (Which was the smithsonian link.) nonbel didn't see the image, and thought that maybe it was being blocked by their ad-blocker / etc software. nonbel turned all that off, and was disappointed that there was still no image of the object.