I would need to see the data. But already we can have a useful conversation about this fictional data, as opposed to a study where they gave an extra glass of w

I would need to see the data. But already we can have a useful conversation about this fictional data, as opposed to a study where they gave an extra glass of wine to 10 people as opposed to a "control" sample of 10 more people and observed what happened. Such a study is basically useless given the noise in what gets published. For years tobacco companies argued that correlation is not causation.