3 ms·
Interesting, thank you. However I did not intend to condemn all radical politics. Rather my point was that the promulgation of any political views by foisting a
by TheLarch 10y ago
Interesting, thank you. However I did not intend to condemn all radical politics. Rather my point was that the promulgation of any political views by foisting a sympathetic vocabulary onto the public is tyrannical. Are there any political ideas that require a new vocabulary? I don't know.
- canuckintime 10y ago> Rather my point was that the promulgation of any political views by foisting a sympathetic vocabulary onto the public is tyrannical. but the examples you gave of political views were "Far Left" "Fox News" "Social Justice Warriors" whereas George Orwell would be concerned about how the seemingly staid mainstream's use of political language. 'smart bombs' 'neutralize target' 'pacification [of Vietnam]' etc are all vocabulary promulgated by establishment politicians and mainstream newspapers and vastly more dangerous than what "social justice warriors" try to foist.
- TheLarch 10y agoYou're right in that the mainstream is guilty as well. I see SJWs as attempting to suppress free speech however, which I perceive as unambiguously tyrannical.
- popmystack 10y agoDo you not see a problem with your rhetoric? "SJW" is something Orwell would take issue with, especially your use of it.
- TheLarch 10y agoI'm not so sure. "Social justice" often tramples free speech.