3 ms·

This is so so so very much cheaper than building freeways and promoting single occupancy driving.

• matthewowen 10y ago
  Lyft (not Lyft line) is for all practical terms single occupancy driving. There might be two people in the car, but only one of them has a purpose to the trip.
  • ndonnellan 10y ago
    But the capacity (utilization) factor is potentially much higher. If a lyft driver takes 10 people to and from the train in a day, 1 car is used for 10 trips versus 10 cars and their corresponding storage costs. The variable costs might be similar, but the fixed/capital costs are much lower. If the lyft driver picks up more than 1 person, the costs start to drop precipitously.
    • acgourley 10y ago
      If there is still one car for one person making each leg of the trip, the on road utilization has not changed. The parking utilization has been reduced, however, which then could open more lanes and increase density.
      • hiou 10y ago
        The road utilization has increased as well as the fuel usage for the driving between passenger drop offs and pickups. As well as the commute of the Lyft driver. That said, if it causes people to take the train the next 25 miles into the city as opposed to driving it could actually decrease.
  • huherto 10y ago
    Only for the first segment of the trip. The rest and largest part of the trip is on the rail which is shared by many.