2 ms·
> I'm not convinced that kids learn lessons like these better when it's spelled out for them. I'm no child psychologist, but I'd even tentatively argue it coul
by CaptSpify 10y ago
> I'm not convinced that kids learn lessons like these better when it's spelled out for them.
I'm no child psychologist, but I'd even tentatively argue it could be damaging.
I remember being a kid and seeing both: shows that tried to teach me, and shows that were entertaining. I remember even young-me rolling my eyes at "educational" shows. Sure, some were great, but most of the time, I'd rather watch the entertaining ones, because I didn't feel like they were pushing something onto me.
Once I got into school, I realized "oh, it's more of this educational crap". I clearly remember being skeptical of whatever they taught me, because, once again, it felt like they were pushing something onto me.
The same thing with games (video and non). I hated games that tried to teach me things. There was a clear contrast of quality between entertainment games, and learning games.
- Retra 10y agoPlus, one poignant, memorable lesson can have a deep impact. There's no need to inundate them.
- brbrodude 10y agoKids aren't dumb... I was very analytical since young, when I have a child I'll treat him/her as not-stupid, definitely. The only issue is, uncritical people make better "citizens" in our society, it's tough being a nonconformist..