> This logic is full of holes. I don't agree. The commenter said that now both the robot and the worker use resources. It's gotten better if you only look at t

> This logic is full of holes. I don't agree. The commenter said that now both the robot and the worker use resources. It's gotten better if you only look at the business and ignore the laid-off worker. Note that I'm always for such improvements, the solution for a broken system should not be to let people do useless jobs (like the road workers whose sole job it is to hold up a "Stop" sign in a construction zone).