I think a better question would be, do any languages have features that help _you_ follow an aspect-oriented paradigm? At the end of the day, you can use just

I think a better question would be, do any languages have features that help _you_ follow an aspect-oriented paradigm? At the end of the day, you can use just about any paradigm in Java. By no means does it enforce OO. Ditto for just about any other language. But certain features make it easy to use OO, so when using it, you feel compelled to use that paradigm. Do any languages make it easy? Ruby, for example, allows it. But it feels like it was never intended. Someone actually just posted about this on HN: http://cfis.savagexi.com/2007/09/05/rails-unusual-architecture http://cfis.savagexi.com/2007/09/05/rails-unusual-architectu...