4 ms·

> They say that without aggregation scale-out is > impossible. That's simply not true. Using things like > anycast and ECMP it's super easy . . . The

> They say that without aggregation scale-out is > impossible. That's simply not true. Using things like > anycast and ECMP it's super easy . . . Then you haven't worked at significant scale. That's fine! Just keep everything in context :)

bluecmd 10y ago
A "probably" there would be nice. I don't want to have to defend myself, but I'm pretty confident about the scale I've worked on. I guess it boils down to what you call aggregation. Is having multiple stateless receivers behind anycast/ECMP aggregation writing to a distributed database aggregation? I'd argue not, but maybe this is where the difference in opinion lies.