3 ms·
That video in the article was the biggest load of ... I can't even find a word to describe how awfully irrelevant and non informational it was. They obviously
by cyberferret 10y ago
That video in the article was the biggest load of ... I can't even find a word to describe how awfully irrelevant and non informational it was. They obviously had an intern sitting around and they needed to give them a job creating some animations for a day...
In any case, if they do find planet 9.5, I hope they call it 'Rupert' as a tribute to Douglas Adams...
- TheOtherHobbes 10y agoThe animations look like stock - there's a Getty credit at the end. The intern probably just did the animated wordy bits.
- scarygliders 10y agoI just clicked into the comments here to say exactly that. The article is a load of cobblers. There's not even an informative diagram to illustrate that planetary body's oddness. As for that embedded video - yuck! It would have been better for the submitter here to have just supplied the paper's URL, said paper even has informative diagrams : http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.01808 http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.01808
- chinathrow 10y agoThat video is only there to keep your eyeballs a little bit longer on the site in order to generate eventually more ad revenue. I hated it too and I hated it even more because I fell for it and played it.
- soufron 10y agoI felt exactly the same. WTF was this bullshit video?