3 ms·
I also found quality/features to be an odd distinction to make. Then again, I've never been a real fan of 'cheap' either. Experience has shown that there are
by roc 17y ago
I also found quality/features to be an odd distinction to make.
Then again, I've never been a real fan of 'cheap' either.
Experience has shown that there are very real upper-bounds on the effectiveness of throwing resources at projects.
And, particularly when you're having these late-cycle meetings, it strikes me as flat-out disingenuous to imply that throwing money at a project is a reasonable or even plausible way to hit an expanded scope on an existing schedule.
- Alex63 17y agoTrue. The triangle doesn't really call out the issue of non-linear increase in cost/risk of changes as the project progresses, or other aspects of Brooks's Law.