I didn't say it was likely we would find something violate causality, I said it was likely we would find exceptions to some of the laws of physics. I know thos

I didn't say it was likely we would find something violate causality, I said it was likely we would find exceptions to some of the laws of physics. I know those sentences were next to each other, so I could have separated the flow of my thoughts a little better. I thought causality was something not-as-well-proven as it currently is (because the history of QM always explains lots of interpretations where causality is broken). However, I stand corrected on that point :)