5 ms·
> To the curious who stayed behind, Berners-Lee explained that the Web could be used to connect all the information on the internet through hyperlinks. You coul
by zeveb 10y ago
> To the curious who stayed behind, Berners-Lee explained that the Web could be used to connect all the information on the internet through hyperlinks. You could click on a word or a phrase in a document and immediately retrieve a related document, click again on a phrase in that document, and so on. It acted like a web laid over the internet, so you could spider from one source of information to another on nearly invisible threads.
One of the saddest things about the modern Internet is how little hypertext is used. As an example, I would have expected, 'Mark McCahill' to link to his personal or academic site[0], 'San Diego' to link to the city government's site[1], 'Hyatt Islandia' to link to that hotel's site [2] (perhaps with a note that its name has changed), and 'Mission Bay' to link to an appropriate page [3] — and that's in the first paragraph alone.
It's also interesting how those slides from 1992 look current as of 2016: flat, bullet-pointed, sans-serif font.
> But the internet was not yet open for business. It had been built on dot-mil and dot-edu, on public funds. Programmers shared source code; if you needed something, someone gave it to you. A dot-com address was considered crass. It was “as though all of TV was PBS,” Lindner says. “No commercials.”
Those really were the days. I remember the Canter & Siegel spam, and how appalled we all were to see it. The Internet then was more genteel. Honestly, I wish it were still non-commercial: available to be used by companies (as it was even in the 90s), but not as an advertising medium.
> At GopherCon ’93, Yen announced that for-profit Gopher users would need to pay the U a licensing fee: hundreds or thousands of dollars, depending on the size and nature of their business. Many users felt betrayed. In the open-source computing spirit of the day, they had contributed code to Gopher, helping the team keep up with the times. Now they were being asked to pony up.
As much as it's become fashionable to group-hate esr the last decade or so, I think that it's important to recognise his major contribution: persuading folks the free software (under a different name) can be good for business. Imagine if the university had kept Gopher as GPLed software, rather than demanding money from its users.
> At its peak, the Mother Gopher consisted of 10 Apple IIci computers. But when it was finally euthanized, who knows what shape it was in. There was no ceremony. Nothing was carted off to a museum. Gopherspace simply became emptier, and the world without the Web became harder to imagine.
That's definitely sad. We need to do a better job of honouring our history and marking important events. Even in the late 90s or early 2000s, folks ought to have recognised the historic import of gopher.
[0] https://fds.duke.edu/db/aas/ISIS/faculty/mark.mccahill https://fds.duke.edu/db/aas/ISIS/faculty/mark.mccahill
[1] https://www.sandiego.gov/ https://www.sandiego.gov/
[2] http://missionbay.regency.hyatt.com/en/hotel/home.html http://missionbay.regency.hyatt.com/en/hotel/home.html
[3] https://www.sandiego.gov/park-and-recreation/parks/regional/missionbay https://www.sandiego.gov/park-and-recreation/parks/regional/...
- peatmoss 10y agoThe pervasive hyperlinkng you mention seems to have a (large) niche in Wikipedia.
- nickpsecurity 10y agoSo much they use themselves as the canonical example in the image for it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperlink https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperlink
- zeveb 10y ago> The pervasive hyperlinkng you mention seems to have a (large) niche in Wikipedia. True enough, but back when the Web was young everyone linked pervasively. My impression back then is that that was what the Web was for.
- cmdrfred 10y agoThat's why its "The Web" no? Many almost randomly interconnected threads? That's how I think of it.
- zubat 10y agoWe also didn't have great search capability yet. A document lived alone unless the author took pains to connect it. A lot of my surfing was done via other people's linkdumps. This was good in some respects since it encouraged a high degree of cooperation, but it's definitely easier to access most things now.
- jerf 10y ago"One of the saddest things about the modern Internet is how little hypertext is used. As an example, I would have expected, 'Mark McCahill' to link to his personal or academic site[0], 'San Diego' to link to the city government's site[1], 'Hyatt Islandia' to link to that hotel's site [2] (perhaps with a note that its name has changed), and 'Mission Bay' to link to an appropriate page [3] — and that's in the first paragraph alone." If it's trivial for you to come up with the link, then it's not very useful because it's trivial for me, too. Similarly for something trying to automatically add links; I've actually seen that functionality and it's more annoying than helpful, obscuring the links added by humans with intention. If it's challenging for you to come up with it, then it takes effort and on average people won't do it. Pretty much no matter how you slice it, there's no story that results in the sort of hyperlinking you mention.