3 ms·
I think you ignored breischl's point, which was about context mattering. That is, you can't treat the claim as a logical proposition alone in the universe.
by scott_s 10y ago
I think you ignored breischl's point, which was about context mattering. That is, you can't treat the claim as a logical proposition alone in the universe.
- yummyfajitas 10y agoI'm not disputing that context can provide information about an action, I'm disputing the need to use circular reasoning/appeals to emotion rather than clear objective principles.