4 ms·
Not sure how "responsive" this is. The litmus test uses the simplest of all the email templates and just looks like centered, possibly tabular content. https:/
by buckbova 10y ago
Not sure how "responsive" this is. The litmus test uses the simplest of all the email templates and just looks like centered, possibly tabular content.
https://litmus.com/checklist/emails/public/2e539c3 https://litmus.com/checklist/emails/public/2e539c3
This different than zurb?
http://foundation.zurb.com/emails/email-templates.html http://foundation.zurb.com/emails/email-templates.html
- blowski 10y agoThat's about as responsive as you can get, unfortunately. Outlook and Gmail don't support the CSS box model, so you have to use tables and that really limits what you can do on mobiles.
- ommunist 10y agoThere are interesting workarounds for Gmail based on use of viewport width. http://emailcodegeek.com/responsive-email-in-gmail/ http://emailcodegeek.com/responsive-email-in-gmail/
- tronvig 10y agoI don't think media queries work in email clients. Responsive usually just means setting a width for mobile and displaying that same layout centered on anything with a larger view.
- dntrkv 10y agoThere are a bunch of mobile clients and some newer desktop clients that support media queries: https://litmus.com/help/email-clients/media-query-support/ https://litmus.com/help/email-clients/media-query-support/
- eli 10y agoYeah, but not all of them. So you either have to get very creative or decide you're ok with having tiny, zoomed-out looking emails in the native Gmail App (which has a significant user base)
- sbarre 10y agoYeah curious to know what this brings that Foundation for Emails does not? Foundation is free (and at version 2.0 with a decent well-tested workflow).