> On the other, I agree that the FCC is a federal governmental organisation that should not have precedent over a State's rights. There's a bit of confusion he

> On the other, I agree that the FCC is a federal governmental organisation that should not have precedent over a State's rights. There's a bit of confusion here. This is not as much of a state's rights issue as it is a law vs lack of law issue. The court essentially said "make it a federal law, then that trumps state law...but your whims do not". While I dislike the outcome, I'm not torn; the decision was absolutely correct. If this is something you want congress to address, contact your congressman.