>what are the points you agree with? I agree that free software is better for users than non-free. And potentially better for the whole society. As for "freed

>what are the points you agree with? I agree that free software is better for users than non-free. And potentially better for the whole society. As for "freedom to impose restrictions on users", I see it just the same way I see property rights. You can do whatever you want: share, sell, gift, lease (under any conditions), ignore any use altogether, etc. And users are free to choose. Maybe I'm missing some point. I've seen very few of RMS talks and never met him in person. That said, I can basically agree with everything else you wrote. Thank you for sharing your opinion.