> Let's throw something useful (duck typing) Not sure why you say this is throwing away duck typing, you just don't add a type hint and you continue working as

> Let's throw something useful (duck typing) Not sure why you say this is throwing away duck typing, you just don't add a type hint and you continue working as usual. > I'm sincerely disgusted I can sympathize, most of the time when there is a talk about Lisp there is a guy who comes just to say "dynamic typing is bad", etc. Well, even though there are definitely static analyzers for Lisp (see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12216701 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12216701), the language is still the same and doesn't prevent anyone from using dynamic features. People who really want statically typed programs won't touch Python anyway so I don't think you have much to worry.